Post-Romanow pharmacare: last-dollar first...first-dollar lost?


Related Publications

Smolina K, Weymann D, Morgan S, Ross C, Carleton B. Association between regulatory advisories and codeine prescribing to postpartum women. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2015;313(18):1861-2.
Suter E, Misfeldt R, Mallinson S, Wilhelm A, Boakye O, Marchildon G, et al. Comparative Review of the Policy Landscape of Team-based Primary Health Care Service Delivery in Western Canada. Alberta Health Services; 2014.
Laberge M, Pang J, Walker K, Wong ST, Hogg W, Wodchis WP. QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care) Canada: A focus on the aspects of primary care most highly rated by current patients of primary care practices. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2014.
McGregor MJ, Abu-Laban RB, Ronald L, McGrail KM, Andrusiek D, Baumbusch J, et al. Nursing Home Characteristics Associated with Resident Transfers to Emergency Department. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2012;33(1):38-48.

Publication Topics

Post-Romanow pharmacare: last-dollar first...first-dollar lost?

Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2004
AuthorsMorgan SG, Willison DJ
Pages10 - 20
Date Published2004
KeywordsCanada, Drug Costs, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services, National Health Programs, Private Sector, Public Sector
AbstractCanada's public-private mix in coverage for pharmaceuticals has long created variation across provinces in access to needed treatments and has contributed to persistent cost growth in both the private and public sectors. Among the recommendations of the 2002 Romanow Commission was a proposed national standard for "last-dollar" pharmacare that would cover any household's drug costs beyond a high annual deductible. Such a program contrasts with the "first-dollar" pharmacare programs currently available for vulnerable populations (e.g., seniors and social assistance recipients) in most provinces. While last-dollar coverage may be a valuable set toward broadening public pharmacare in Canada, there is a risk that provincial governments may interpret the coverage of catastrophic costs as the new pharmacare ideal and therefore reduce or eliminate existing programs that currently offer first-dollar benefits.
Citation Key450