Developing an Information System to Identify and Describe Physicians in Clinical Practice in British Columbia

Research

Related Publications

Suter E, Misfeldt R, Mallinson S, Wilhelm A, Boakye O, Marchildon G, et al. Comparative Review of the Policy Landscape of Team-based Primary Health Care Service Delivery in Western Canada. Alberta Health Services; 2014.
Laberge M, Pang J, Walker K, Wong ST, Hogg W, Wodchis WP. QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care) Canada: A focus on the aspects of primary care most highly rated by current patients of primary care practices. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2014.
McGregor MJ, Abu-Laban RB, Ronald L, McGrail KM, Andrusiek D, Baumbusch J, et al. Nursing Home Characteristics Associated with Resident Transfers to Emergency Department. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2012;33(1):38-48.
Koehoorn M, McLeod CB, Fan JK, McGrail KM, Barer ML, Cote P, et al. Do private clinics or expedited fees improve wait- or return-to-work times for injured workers following knee surgery? Healthcare Policy. 2011;5(3):17-26.
Sutherland JM, Barer ML, Evans RG, Crump RT. Will paying the piper change the tune? Healthcare Policy. 2011;6(4):16-24.

Publication Topics

Developing an Information System to Identify and Describe Physicians in Clinical Practice in British Columbia

Title
Publication TypeReport
Year of Publication2006
AuthorsWatson D, Peterson S, Young E, Bogdanovic B
Date Published08/2006
InstitutionUBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research
CityVancouver(BC)
AbstractThis report describes innovative methods used to: (a) develop and validate an anonymized registry of physicians deemed to be delivering clinical services; and (b) document the degree to which increases in the use of alternative fund- ing have altered our capacity to count the clinical physician workforce in British Columbia. It also describes protocols designed to ensure the anonymity of physicians, outlines key elements needed in a physician registry to support popula- tion-based, provider-based and cohort analyses, assesses variations in physician supply estimates when single versus multiple data sources are used, and offers examples of how a physician registry can be used to support important, policy- relevant research. The results presented here rely on data from 1996/97, 2000/01 and 2004/05.