Error message

  • Strict warning: Only variables should be passed by reference in theme_biblio_tabular() (line 285 of /home/www/chspr/sites/all/modules/biblio/includes/biblio_theme.inc).
  • Strict warning: Only variables should be passed by reference in theme_biblio_tabular() (line 285 of /home/www/chspr/sites/all/modules/biblio/includes/biblio_theme.inc).

In Pursuit of Quality: Opportunities to Improve Patient Experiences in British Columbia Emergency Departments

Research

Related Publications

Smolina K, Weymann D, Morgan S, Ross C, Carleton B. Association between regulatory advisories and codeine prescribing to postpartum women. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2015;313(18):1861-2.
Suter E, Misfeldt R, Mallinson S, Wilhelm A, Boakye O, Marchildon G, et al. Comparative Review of the Policy Landscape of Team-based Primary Health Care Service Delivery in Western Canada. Alberta Health Services; 2014.
Laberge M, Pang J, Walker K, Wong ST, Hogg W, Wodchis WP. QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care) Canada: A focus on the aspects of primary care most highly rated by current patients of primary care practices. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2014.
McGregor MJ, Abu-Laban RB, Ronald L, McGrail KM, Andrusiek D, Baumbusch J, et al. Nursing Home Characteristics Associated with Resident Transfers to Emergency Department. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2012;33(1):38-48.

Publication Topics

In Pursuit of Quality: Opportunities to Improve Patient Experiences in British Columbia Emergency Departments

Title
Publication TypeReport
Year of Publication2009
AuthorsWatson D, Peterson S, Black CD
Date Published01/2009
InstitutionUBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research
CityVancouver (BC)
ISBN Number978-1-897085-15-8
AbstractThis report shares new insights about patient views on the care they received in BC emergency departments in 2007. The study is the first in BC to look beyond patient ratings of their emergency room care in order to understand what can be done to make that care better. It takes a close look at factors that drive patient ratings of quality – and specifically those that underlie their reports of positive experiences – in order to identify what health care professionals do well and should continue to do. The report also takes a close look at the minority of patients who report negative experiences, to provide perspective about what providers can do to prevent similar experiences in the future. Factors such as staff courtesy, team work, comprehensive care and availability of nurses, appear to be more important than do wait times in influencing patient ratings.
Full Text